icipe Digital Repository

Weed biological control in Zimbabwe: Challenges and future prospects

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Gerald, Chikowore
dc.contributor.author Grant, D. Martin
dc.contributor.author Frank, Chidawanyika
dc.contributor.author Martin, Hill
dc.contributor.author Stefan, Neser
dc.contributor.author Michael, Day
dc.contributor.author Tony, Grice
dc.contributor.author Godfrey, Chikwenhere
dc.contributor.author Eunice, Mangosho
dc.contributor.author Andy, Sheppard
dc.date.accessioned 2024-01-24T08:05:23Z
dc.date.available 2024-01-24T08:05:23Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12562/1934
dc.description Publication en_US
dc.description.abstract In Zimbabwe, the structure and integrity of various ecosystems is rapidly deteriorating, in part due to invasive alien plants. While there is recognition of the challenges posed by invasive alien plants and the complexity surrounding their successful management, very little has been done, documented or evaluated in the country recently, including classical weed biological control activities. We review the current status of invasive alien plants and classical weed biological control in Zimbabwe especially their management and legislation governing this management. We record the presence and distribution of weed biological control agents currently in Zimbabwe. The Biological Control Target Selection (BCTS) system was used to identify invasive plant species in Zimbabwe that could benefit from on-going or new classical biological control programmes. While biological control has been implemented in the country since the 1960s, and significant control has been achieved on floating aquatic macrophytes, no biological agent has been released on a terres- trial weed since 1961. However, 10 agents released in neighbouring South Africa have spread naturally into the country on contiguous plant populations and some are providing gratuitous control of some of the weeds.We identified 19 invasive alien plants that could be successfully managed through classical weed biological control, and for 12 of these, this could be achieved at minimal cost, as agents are available within the region.Zimbabwe, perhaps with the help of international aid organisations investing in the region, could: a) conduct extensive surveys of established biological control agents already present in the country; b) redistribute these agents into areas of the country where they are not already present and foster those spreading north in South Africa and likely to arrive eventually through natural spread, and; c) initiate new weed biological control programmes against new targets by importing new agents available from South Africa or Australia en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The Afromontane Research Unit (ARU), National Research Foundation (NRF) South African Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE) en_US
dc.publisher South African Journal of Botany en_US
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ *
dc.subject Biological Control Target Selection (BCTS) en_US
dc.subject Ecosystem en_US
dc.subject Invasive alien plants en_US
dc.subject Lantana camara en_US
dc.subject Prioritisation en_US
dc.title Weed biological control in Zimbabwe: Challenges and future prospects en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States

Search icipe Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account