icipe Digital Repository

First Report of Field Efficacy and Economic Viability of Metarhizium anisopliae-ICIPE 20 for Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) Management on Tomato

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kabaale, Fred Peter
dc.contributor.author Tumuhaise, Venansio
dc.contributor.author Tinzaara, William
dc.contributor.author Turyasingura, Geoffrey
dc.contributor.author Turyasingura, Geoffrey
dc.contributor.author Subramanian, Sevgan
dc.contributor.author Fathiya, Khamis
dc.contributor.author Komivi, Akutse
dc.date.accessioned 2023-01-19T07:04:53Z
dc.date.available 2023-01-19T07:04:53Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12562/1780
dc.description Publication en_US
dc.description.abstract Eco-friendly pest control options are highly needed in food crop production systems to mitigate the hazards of synthetic chemical pesticides. Entomopathogenic fungal biopesticides—Metarhizium anisopliae strains ICIPE 20 (oil-formulation containing 1.0 × 109 conidia/mL) and ICIPE 69 (commercialized biopesticide known as Mazao Campaign®)—were evaluated against Tuta absoluta on tomato through inundative foliar spray and compared with the commonly used pesticide Dudu Acelamectin 5% EC (Abamectin 20 g/L + Acetamiprid 3%) and untreated plot. All the treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replicates. The field experiments were conducted for two consecutive cropping seasons in Mukono district, Uganda. Tuta absoluta infestation, injury severity on leaves and fruits, fruit yield loss, marketable fruit yield gain and cost–benefit ratio of the treatments were assessed. The results during both seasons showed a significant lower fruit yield loss in M. anisopliae ICIPE 20-treated plots compared to untreated plots, with a marketable fruit yield gain exceeding 22% and a cost–benefit ratio greater than 2.8 (BCR~3). Dudu Acelamectin 5% EC outperformed all the other treatments, but needs to be considered with caution due to its non-target effect and resistance development, whereas M. anisopliae ICIPE 69 performed the least well. In addition, the findings showed the high degree of efficacy and economic viability of these biopesticides as a potential T. absoluta control option in the field. However, it is important to further explore different formulations of these eco-friendly biopesticides, inoculum delivery approach, application frequency, their effectiveness in different agro-ecological zones and compatibility with commonly used pesticides in tomato production systems for sustainable management of T. absoluta. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship BioInnovate Africa Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) DFID African Union (AU) International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe) Busitema University Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Government of the Republic of Kenya en_US
dc.publisher MDPI - Sustainability en_US
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ *
dc.subject Metarhizium anisopliae en_US
dc.subject biopesticide en_US
dc.subject entomopathogen en_US
dc.subject Tuta absoluta en_US
dc.subject fruit yield loss en_US
dc.subject marketable fruit yield gain en_US
dc.subject cost–benefit ratio en_US
dc.title First Report of Field Efficacy and Economic Viability of Metarhizium anisopliae-ICIPE 20 for Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) Management on Tomato en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States

Search icipe Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account