icipe Digital Repository

Farmers’ perceptions of a ‘push–pull’ technology for control of cereal stemborers and Striga weed in western Kenya

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Zeyaur, R. Khan
dc.contributor.author Amudavi, David M.
dc.contributor.author Midega, Charles A.O.
dc.contributor.author Wanyama, Japhether M.
dc.contributor.author Pickett, John A.
dc.date.accessioned 2017-09-18T13:06:47Z
dc.date.available 2017-09-18T13:06:47Z
dc.date.issued 2008
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/514
dc.identifier.uri https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219407003225
dc.description.abstract Striga and cereal stemborers are major constraints to cereal production in sub-Saharan Africa causing serious food security concerns.The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE) and partners have developed a novel integrated management system called the ‘push–pull’ technology (PPT) in mitigation. This involves inter-cropping maize with a stemborer moth-repellent forage legume,silverleaf desmodium (push), and planting an attractive trap crop, Napier grass (pull), around the intercrop. Additionally, chemicals produced from desmodium roots inhibit Striga. We evaluated farmers’ perceptions of the pests, PPT attributes and factors influencing the likelihood of its adoption in 15 districts in western Kenya. A random sample of 923 farmers, with 478 having adopted the technology (practicing) and 445 not yet adopted but attending PPT field days (visiting) were interviewed. The practicing farmers cited both Striga and stemborers as major maize production constraints, alongside other constraints, as the main motivations for adoption of PPT.Reduced infestation by the pests, improvement in soil fertility, increase in maize grain yields, improved fodder and milk productivity were cited as main benefits of PPT. Similarly, the field day visiting farmers rated PPT as a more superior technology compared to their own maize production practices. Farmer’s age, household headship by female farmers, technology attributes and exposure to a variety of extension methods significantly influenced likelihood of PPT adoption. Effective dissemination pathways are needed to provide farmers with appropriate information for evaluating potential benefits and tradeoffs of such a management-intensive technology. Further research is needed to understand how PPT contributes to farmers’ livelihood improvement and how the efficacy of different dissemination pathways in PPT technology transfer influences its adoption. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) Kilimo Trust en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier Ltd en_US
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ *
dc.subject Farmer perceptions en_US
dc.subject Striga en_US
dc.subject push–pull en_US
dc.title Farmers’ perceptions of a ‘push–pull’ technology for control of cereal stemborers and Striga weed in western Kenya en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States

Search icipe Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account