icipe Digital Repository

Landscape Effects on Crop Pollination Services: are there General Patterns?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ricketts, Taylor H.
dc.contributor.author Regetz, James
dc.contributor.author Steffan- Dewenter, Ingolf
dc.contributor.author Cunningham, Saul A.
dc.contributor.author Kremen, Claire
dc.contributor.author Bogdanski, Anne
dc.contributor.author Gemmill-Herren, Barbara
dc.contributor.author Greenleaf, Sarah S.
dc.contributor.author Klein, Alexandra M.
dc.contributor.author Mayfield, Margaret M.
dc.contributor.author Morandin, Lora A.
dc.contributor.author Ochieng, Alfred
dc.contributor.author Viana, Blande F.
dc.date.accessioned 2017-09-18T12:01:13Z
dc.date.available 2017-09-18T12:01:13Z
dc.date.issued 2008
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/506
dc.identifier.uri https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01157.x
dc.description Ecology Letters en_US
dc.description.abstract Pollination by bees and other animals increases the size, quality, or stability of harvests for 70% of leading global crops. Because native species pollinate many of these crops effectively, conserving habitats for wild pollinators within agricultural landscapes can help maintain pollination services. Using hierarchical Bayesian techniques, we synthesize the results of 23 studies – representing 16 crops on five continents – to estimate the general relationship between pollination services and distance from natural or semi-natural habitats. We find strong exponential declines in both pollinator richness and native visitation rate. Visitation rate declines more steeply, dropping to half of its maximum at 0.6 km from natural habitat, compared to 1.5 km for richness. Evidence of general decline in fruit and seed set – variables that directly affect yields – is less clear. Visitation rate drops more steeply in tropical compared with temperate regions, and slightly more steeply for social compared with solitary bees. Tropical crops pollinated primarily by social bees may therefore be most susceptible to pollination failure from habitat loss. Quantifying these general relationships can help predict consequences of land use change on pollinator communities and crop productivity, and can inform landscape conservation efforts that balance the needs of native species and people. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship NSF (Grant #DEB-0553768), the University of California, Santa Barbara and the State of California. en_US
dc.publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd en_US
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ *
dc.subject Agriculture en_US
dc.subject bees en_US
dc.subject ecosystem services en_US
dc.subject habitat fragmentation en_US
dc.subject hierarchical Bayesian model en_US
dc.subject land use en_US
dc.subject pollinators en_US
dc.title Landscape Effects on Crop Pollination Services: are there General Patterns? en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States

Search icipe Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account