icipe Digital Repository

Economic Performance of the ‘Push–pull’ Technology for Stemborer and Striga Control in Smallholder Farming Systems in Western Kenya

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Khan, Zeyaur R.
dc.contributor.author Midega, Charles A.O.
dc.contributor.author Njuguna, Esther M.
dc.contributor.author Amudavi, David M.
dc.contributor.author Wanyama, Japhether M.
dc.contributor.author Pickett, John A.
dc.date.accessioned 2017-09-15T08:47:10Z
dc.date.available 2017-09-15T08:47:10Z
dc.date.issued 2008
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/463
dc.identifier.uri https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219408000069
dc.description.abstract The ‘push–pull’ technology (PPT), developed in Africa, offers effective control of cereal stemborers and Striga weed in maize-based cropping systems. It involves intercropping maize with desmodium, Desmodium uncinatum, with Napier grass, Pennisetum purpureum, planted as border around this intercrop. Desmodium repels the stemborer moths (push) that are subsequently attracted to the Napier grass (pull). Desmodium also suppresses and eliminates Striga. We assessed economic performance of this technology compared to the conventional maize mono- and maize–bean intercropping systems in six districts in western Kenya over 4–7 years. Ten farmers were randomly recruited in each district and each planted three plots representing the three cropping systems. The cost–benefit analyses were carried out, together with the systems’ net returns to land and labour and their discounted net present values (NPV). Maize grain yields and associated gross margins from the PPT system were significantly higher than those in the other two systems. Although the production costs were significantly higher in the PPT than in the two cropping systems in the first cropping year, these reduced to either the same level or significantly lower than in the maize–bean intercrop from the second year onwards in most of the districts. Similarly, the net returns to land and labour with the PPT were significantly higher than with the other two systems. The PPT consistently produced positive NPV when the incremental flows of its benefits compared to those of the two conventional systems were discounted at 10–30%, indicating that PPT is more profitable than the other two systems under realistic production assumptions. PPT is thus a viable option for enhancing productivity and diversification for smallholder farmers who largely depend on limited land resource. Hence, enhancing farmers’ access to less costly planting materials and promoting quality education and training in the use of this knowledge-intensive technology could stimulate its successful adoption. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Gatsby Charitable Foundation, UK, Kilimo Trust East Africa and Biovision, Switzerland en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ *
dc.subject Stemborer en_US
dc.subject Striga en_US
dc.subject Push–pull en_US
dc.subject Gross margins en_US
dc.subject Kenya en_US
dc.title Economic Performance of the ‘Push–pull’ Technology for Stemborer and Striga Control in Smallholder Farming Systems in Western Kenya en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States

Search icipe Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account