dc.contributor.author | Gracious M, Diiro | |
dc.contributor.author | Monica, Fisher | |
dc.contributor.author | Menale, Kassie | |
dc.contributor.author | Beatrice W, Muriithi | |
dc.contributor.author | Geoffrey, Muricho | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-15T06:55:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-07-15T06:55:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1489 | |
dc.description.abstract | Considerable research documents why women farmers have lower technology adoption rates than men farmers, but relatively little is known about what happens within a household after technology uptake. This study con-tributes through an investigation of the intrahousehold distribution of benefits and costs of agricultural tech-nology adoption in western Kenya. Using gender-disaggregated data and an endogenous switching regression approach, we elucidate the causal effects of push pull technology (PPT) adoption on intrahousehold labor and expenditure allocation. Results show that adoption increases household labor allocation for harvesting of maize, the staple crop, but reduces the labor required for other tasks (e.g., ploughing and weeding). In net, the tech-nology is labor saving, with men experiencing a slightly greater workload reduction than women. In terms of expenditure impacts, PPT uptake increases household expenditures on children’s education and consumption goods commonly associated with female preferences. Study findings support wider uptake of PPT to trigger gains in social and economic wellbeing for both men and women farmers. Implications for policy and practice are discussed | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD) Government of Canada (IDRC) European Union Integrated Biological Control Applied Research Programme (IBCARP) International Centre of Insect Physiology Ecology (icipe) UK Government Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) Germany Kenyan Government. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ | * |
dc.subject | Agriculture | en_US |
dc.subject | Child schooling | en_US |
dc.subject | Labor allocation | en_US |
dc.subject | Technology adoption | en_US |
dc.subject | Intrahousehold allocation | en_US |
dc.subject | Kenya | en_US |
dc.title | Food Policy 102 (2021) 102114 Available online 26 June 2021 0306-9192/© 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.How does adoption of labor saving agricultural technologies affect intrahousehold resource allocations? The case of push-pull technology in Western Kenya | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
The following license files are associated with this item: