icipe Digital Repository

Evaluation of African Maize Cultivars for Resistance to FallArmywormSpodoptera frugiperda(J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae) Larvae

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Xavier Chiriboga, Morales
dc.contributor.author Amanuel, Tamiru
dc.contributor.author Islam S, Sobhy
dc.contributor.author Toby J. A, Bruce
dc.contributor.author Charles A. O, Midega
dc.contributor.author Zeyaur, Khan
dc.date.accessioned 2021-07-13T09:25:22Z
dc.date.available 2021-07-13T09:25:22Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1485
dc.description.abstract The fall armyworm (FAW) has recently invaded and become an important pest of maizein Africa causing yield losses reaching up to a third of maize annual production. The present studyevaluated different aspects of resistance of six maize cultivars, cropped by farmers in Kenya, toFAW larvae feeding under laboratory and field conditions. We assessed the arrestment and feedingof FAW neonate larvae in no-choice and choice experiments, development of larvae-pupae, foodassimilation under laboratory conditions and plant damage in a field experiment. We did not findcomplete resistance to FAW feeding in the evaluated maize cultivars, but we detected differences inacceptance and preference when FAW larvae were given a choice between certain cultivars. Moreover,the smallest pupal weight and the lowest growth index were found on ’SC Duma 43′leaves, whichsuggests an effect of antibiosis of this maize hybrid against FAW larvae. In contrast, the highestgrowth index was recorded on ‘Rachar ’ and the greatest pupal weight was found on ‘Nyamula’ and‘Rachar’. The density of trichomes on the leaves of these maize cultivars seems not to be directlyrelated to the preference of neonates for feeding. Plant damage scores were not statistically differentbetween cultivars in the field neither under natural nor artificial infestation. However, plant damagescores in ‘Nyamula’ and ‘Jowi’ tended to be lower in the two last samplings of the season comparedto the two initial samplings under artificial infestation. Our study provides insight into FAW larvalpreferences and performance on some African maize cultivars, showing that there are differencesbetween cultivars in these variables; but high levels of resistance to larvae feeding were not found. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council of the UK UK’s Foreign,Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) The Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Government of the Republic of Kenya en_US
dc.publisher MDPI Plants en_US
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ *
dc.subject fall armyworm en_US
dc.subject larval feeding en_US
dc.subject maize en_US
dc.subject cultivars en_US
dc.subject host-plant resistanc en_US
dc.subject Africa en_US
dc.title Evaluation of African Maize Cultivars for Resistance to FallArmywormSpodoptera frugiperda(J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae) Larvae en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States

Search icipe Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account