icipe Digital Repository

Cellular and molecular targets of waterbuck repellent blend odors in antennae of Glossina fuscipes fuscipes, Newstead, 1910

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Diallo, S.
dc.contributor.author Shahbaaz, M.
dc.contributor.author Torto, B.
dc.contributor.author Christoffels, A.
dc.contributor.author Masiga, D.
dc.contributor.author Getahun, M.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-06-09T08:50:25Z
dc.date.available 2021-06-09T08:50:25Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1404
dc.description Research Article en_US
dc.description.abstract Insects that transmit many of the world’s deadliest animal diseases, for instance trypanosomosis, find their suitable hosts and avoid non-preferred hosts mostly through olfactory cues. The waterbuck repellent blend (WRB) comprising geranylacetone, guaiacol, pentanoic acid, and δ-octalactone derived from waterbuck skin odor is a repellent to some savannah-adapted tsetse flies and reduces trap catches of riverine species. However, the cellular and molecular mechanisms associated with detection and coding of the repellent odors remain to be elucidated. Here, we demonstrated that WRB inhibited blood feeding in both Glossina pallidipes Austen, 1903 and Glossina fuscipes fuscipes Newstead, 1910. Using the DREAM (Deorphanization of Receptors based on Expression Alterations in odorant receptor mRNA levels) technique, combined with ortholog comparison and molecular docking, we predicted the putative odorant receptors (ORs) for the WRB in G. f. fuscipes, a non-model insect. We show that exposure of G. f. fuscipes in vivo to WRB odorant resulted in up- and downregulation of mRNA transcript of several ORs. The WRB component with strong feeding inhibition altered mRNA transcript differently as compared to an attractant odor, showing these two odors of opposing valence already segregate at the cellular and molecular levels. Furthermore, molecular dynamics simulations demonstrated that the predicted ligand–OR binding pockets consisted mostly of hydrophobic residues with a few hydrogen bonds but a stable interaction. Finally, our electrophysiological response showed the olfactory sensory neurons of G. f. fuscipes tuned to the tsetse repellent components in different sensitivity and selectivity. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Integrated Biological Control Applied Research Program (IBCARP) Camel grant no. DCI-FOOD/2014/346–739, mainly by the European Union. Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), United Kingdom Department for International Development (DFID), the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), the Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, and the Kenyan government. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the donors. The Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD) provided Souleymane Diallo with a doctoral scholarship through the icipe ARPPIS-DAAD scholarship program. en_US
dc.publisher Frontiers in Celluar Neuroscience en_US
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ *
dc.subject Glossina fuscipes fuscipes en_US
dc.subject Cellular en_US
dc.subject Molecular en_US
dc.title Cellular and molecular targets of waterbuck repellent blend odors in antennae of Glossina fuscipes fuscipes, Newstead, 1910 en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States

Search icipe Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account